Tuesday, April 21, 2009

April 24, Friday, Pete's Day

Scientology reading, I think, as a comparison with some of the religious fiction we have read.

7 comments:

  1. Jordann Markowitz

    Is Scientology trying to prove it is a better religion than others because it is loosely based on things we consider to be scientific facts, like evolution?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sara Welish

    What is an E-Meter? Are there a lot of people who believe in Scientology?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shannon Potts

    I'm just confused by the last paragraph of Chapter 1. What are restimulation, and the track?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maeve Tischbein

    A lot of the things mentioned in the reading (i.e. "theta-bodies" or "MEST bodies") seem like allegories for common ideas. Why is this? Are they more than simple allegories?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Doug Ritchey

    I would like to know if Volney Mathison obtained his "electronic genius" through the miracles of whole track auditing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Zander,
    I'd like to know if L. Ron Hubbard actually believed any of this, or if he just wanted to make a story, saw people believing it and just rolled with it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Katie Burke

    Does L. Ron Hubbard try to use scientific terms and explanations in order to make his story seem more real and believable?

    ReplyDelete